From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Recipient: devel@linux.iplabs.ru To: devel@linux.iplabs.ru Subject: Re: [devel] [vdanen@mandrakesoft.com: Re: [Cooker] New update revision scheme? (was: Re: [Announce] MDKA-2000:013 - MandrakeUpdate update)] Message-ID: <20001113084033.A2693@localhost.localdomain> Mail-Followup-To: mookid@sigent.ru, devel@linux.iplabs.ru References: <20001113032340.B13436@LDV.fandra.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: <20001113032340.B13436@LDV.fandra.org>; from ldv@fandra.org on Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 03:23:40AM +0300 From: mookid@sigent.ru (Mikhail Zabaluev) Sender: devel-admin@linux.iplabs.ru Errors-To: devel-admin@linux.iplabs.ru X-BeenThere: devel@linux.iplabs.ru X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: devel@linux.iplabs.ru List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: IPLabs Linux Team Developers mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://www.logic.ru/pipermail/devel/ X-Original-Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 08:40:33 +0300 Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 08:40:33 +0300 Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: Hello Dmitry, On Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 03:23 +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote: > > Greetings! > > Информация к размышлению (на тему: как мы будем делать?): > > ----- Forwarded message from Vincent Danen ----- > > Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 22:47:21 -0700 > From: Vincent Danen > To: cooker@linux-mandrake.com > Subject: Re: [Cooker] New update revision scheme? (was: Re: [Announce] MDKA-2000:013 - MandrakeUpdate update) > > On Fri Nov 10, 2000 at 11:15:21PM +0100, Alexander Skwar wrote: > > > So sprach Vincent Danen am Fri, Nov 10, 2000 at 03:43:51PM -0700: > > > This update for MandrakeUpdate allows MandrakeUpdate to install updated > > > RPMs using the new update revision scheme. This update is necessary > > > > New update revision scheme? What's that? > > Updates in MandrakeUpdate will always have a dotted revision number > now (like 1.1mdk) so that new cooker packages will *always* remain > newer. Due to the differences in spec files, I sometimes end up > building three separate packages for the same thing (ie. bind has > -1.1mdk, -1.2mdk, -1.3mdk). A -1mdk will appear in cooker (same as > the updates), but if changes are made, the next revision in cooker > would be -2mdk. If I did it the old-fashioned way with MU, there > would be -1mdk, -2mdk, -3mdk for the same thing meaning that 6.0 > update of bind (-3mdk old way) would be higher than a newer bind in > cooker (which could be -2mdk). This way, updates has -1.3mdk so -2mdk > in cooker will always be higher. > > Make sense? =) Разумно =) -- Stay tuned, MhZ mailto:mookid@sigent.ru ----------- And I heard Jeff exclaim, As they strolled out of sight, "Merry Christmas to all -- You take credit cards, right?" -- "Outsiders" comic _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@linux.iplabs.ru http://www.logic.ru/mailman/listinfo/devel