From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <lakostis@altlinux.ru>
Message-ID: <18182.127.0.0.1.1143285317.squirrel@mojo.myroom.ru>
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 14:15:17 +0300 (MSK)
From: "Konstantin A. Lepikhov" <lakostis@altlinux.ru>
To: devel@lists.altlinux.org
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.7 [CVS]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Importance: Normal
X-AV-Checked: ClamAV using ClamSMTP
Subject: [devel] =?utf-8?b?UTog0YTQuNCz0L3RjyDRgSBvY2FtbA==?=
X-BeenThere: devel@lists.altlinux.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.7
Precedence: list
Reply-To: ALT Devel discussion list <devel@lists.altlinux.org>
List-Id: ALT Devel discussion list <devel.lists.altlinux.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.altlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/devel>,
	<mailto:devel-request@lists.altlinux.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.altlinux.org/pipermail/devel>
List-Post: <mailto:devel@lists.altlinux.org>
List-Help: <mailto:devel-request@lists.altlinux.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.altlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/devel>,
	<mailto:devel-request@lists.altlinux.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 11:15:33 -0000
Archived-At: <http://lore.altlinux.org/devel/18182.127.0.0.1.1143285317.squirrel@mojo.myroom.ru/>
List-Archive: <http://lore.altlinux.org/devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:devel@altlinux.org>

Hi!

Новый ocaml в сизифе стал генерить очень странный код - его даже ldd не
понимает. Из-за этого у меня обламывается сборка mldonkey вот с такой
руганью:

Verifying ELF objects in /usr/src/tmp/mldonkey-buildroot
(arch=normal,fhs=relaxed,rpath=normal,textrel=normal,unresolv
ed=normal)
ldd: ./usr/bin/mldonkey_make_torrent: trace failed
ldd: ./usr/bin/mlguistarter: trace failed
ldd: ./usr/bin/mlgui: trace failed
ldd: ./usr/bin/mlnet+gui: trace failed
ldd: ./usr/bin/mlnet: trace failed
ldd: ./usr/bin/mlim: trace failed
ldd: ./usr/bin/mlchat: trace failed

[builder@bin]$ ldd ./mlchat
        not a dynamic executable

Что скажет по-этому поводу новый мантейнер ocaml, неужели у него все
работает? %)

-- 
WBR et al.