From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <010b01c2ecdf$f5751b70$400aa8c0@434ntws> From: "Anton V. Denisov" To: Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 11:50:15 +1200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 X-Return-Path: fire@kgpu.kamchatka.ru X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: devel@altlinux.org Subject: [devel] Q: libstdc++2.95-devel requires Sender: devel-admin@altlinux.ru Errors-To: devel-admin@altlinux.ru X-BeenThere: devel@altlinux.ru X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: devel@altlinux.ru List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: Приветствую всех. А должен ли пакет libstdc++2.95-devel зависеть от libstdc++2.96-devel? $ rpmquery --requires libstdc++2.95-devel rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 /usr/sbin/update-alternatives gcc-common >= 1.2 libstdc++2.96-devel rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 В то время как: $ rpmquery --requires libstdc++2.96-devel rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 /usr/sbin/update-alternatives gcc-common >= 1.2 libstdc++2.96 = 2.96-alt3 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 Разница налицо. Всё это происходит с $ rpmquery libstdc++2.9{5,6}-devel libstdc++2.95-devel-2.95.3-alt3 libstdc++2.96-devel-2.96-alt3 С уважением, Антон В. Денисов.