From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on sa.int.altlinux.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.2.5 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=AaQkwDEFEn11QjiM9HXndKw3lKHfSke70tYq9kkA82o=; b=aeMg3FjGwVgGtE1uC5ZAcKX9ts9Z0SyqRMaBHv5+LsSlSwCSwJUHkElgLWLaUDW9/f uqsP2keJvUiQkgFpjlnVOsctY+VS8pGUdo31zLfRktmVtMuYmhTq1AVkSuOjnay8qYbV faleaC4VN2sbjhNr4PLhCW3gWPTq2xu1p5dSM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=msct11v4PC2I40Oc2savYem6Ii/sfBcJZTzDpnqkabUXKvxfYFvDvUn/IDiIuYgYEd yIlJQ2NyhAJ3TOlgrgBa6ct3u93/nxJGnEU9iPo7eynAGuVRghjManWKd5mLhAMfFshQ S5whFIgN9YAkeca8CTtfuolqmAAEHDbSRLX9E= Message-ID: <4C90B0EA.1070204@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 14:41:30 +0300 From: andriy User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; uk; rv:1.9.2.9pre) Gecko/20100817 Thunderbird/3.1.3pre MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "devel@ where you _can_ ask" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: [newbies] distcc X-BeenThere: devel-newbies@lists.altlinux.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: "devel@ where you _can_ ask" List-Id: "devel@ where you _can_ ask" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 11:34:25 -0000 Archived-At: List-Archive: Hi, community! Имеет ли смысл использовать distcc с точки зрения корректной компиляции кода. (Читал, что некоторые большие проекты, типа ОО не рекомендуют им собирать). Использует ли кто-то из мейнтейнеров distcc? Как он работает в связке с hasher'ом? Спасибо за ответы.