From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 14:19:01 +0300 From: Mikhail Efremov To: devel-newbies@lists.altlinux.org Message-ID: <20160126141902.0ed7b78a@sem-notebook> In-Reply-To: <56A71707.70601@ya.ru> References: <56A71707.70601@ya.ru> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.1 (GTK+ 2.24.21; x86_64-alt-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [newbies] =?utf-8?b?0JrQsNC6INC/0YDQsNCy0LjQu9GM0L3QviDRg9C60LA=?= =?utf-8?b?0LfQsNGC0Ywg0YHQvNC10YjQsNC90L3Rg9GOINC70LjRhtC10L3Qt9C40Y4g?= =?utf-8?b?0LIg0YHQv9C10LrQtT8=?= X-BeenThere: devel-newbies@lists.altlinux.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: "devel@ where you _can_ ask" List-Id: "devel@ where you _can_ ask" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 11:19:09 -0000 Archived-At: List-Archive: On Tue, 26 Jan 2016 13:49:43 +0700 =D0=90=D0=BD=D1=82=D0=BE=D0=BD =D0=9C=D0= =B8=D0=B4=D1=8E=D0=BA=D0=BE=D0=B2 wrote: > =D0=9A=D0=B0=D0=BA =D0=B1=D1=83=D0=B4=D0=B5=D1=82 =D0=B2=D1=8B=D0=B3=D0= =BB=D1=8F=D0=B4=D0=B5=D1=82=D1=8C =D1=81=D1=82=D1=80=D0=BE=D0=BA=D0=B0 lice= nse =D0=B2 =D1=81=D0=BF=D0=B5=D0=BA=D0=B5, =D0=B5=D1=81=D0=BB=D0=B8 =D0=BD= =D1=83=D0=B6=D0=BD=D0=BE =D1=83=D0=BA=D0=B0=D0=B7=D0=B0=D1=82=D1=8C=20 > =D0=BE=D0=B4=D0=BD=D0=BE=D0=B2=D1=80=D0=B5=D0=BC=D0=B5=D0=BD=D0=BD=D0=BE = GPL-3.0 =D0=B8 Apache-2.0? /usr/share/doc/rpm-build-licenses-2.0.5/README: Questions & Answers: Q1: What if a package contains parts under different licenses? A: Consider splitting the package into subpackages. If it is not feasible for some reason, mention both licenses, separating them with a comma, e.g.: %gpl2plus, %lgpl2plus Q2: What if a package can be distributed under several licenses? A: Mention the applicable licenses, separating them with a pipe sign or 'or' word (NOT with a slash), e.g.: %mpl|%gpl2plus|lgpl2plus (Firefox license) %gpl2plus or %artistic_license (Perl license; better use %perl_license) Q3: Why shouldn't I use a slash to separate licenses? A: Because of an ambiguity. Consider "GPL/LGPL v.2" that usually means "GPLv2+, LGPLv2+" (as in FAQ1) and "GPL/Artistic" (Perl license that means "Either GPL or Artistic". The initial proposal was here: http://lists.altlinux.org/pipermail/devel/2007-August/049382.html (in Russian). --=20 WBR, Mikhail Efremov