From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dd1email@gmail.com>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on sa.int.altlinux.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS, 
	SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.2.5
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject
	:message-id:mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-type
	:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to;
	bh=XCJyvHpvyzG9AjMzh0u3qiPVOo6UkIiFVYVPSyAaYbs=;
	b=OAIXyo/+ylEza5rYnb+dBR+cHSThh7mdSp4KHqHT+lfu9AsGkiastv2sOadMAZ76ot
	Hy1TVueZtbJr9SdvKevTmD9OEttUS5EJcdsuN01x6u/mQRDSXk7H0GE7E3rhjg8GIfOM
	tZ2cgURzGsNjI2BsbBQNsMYiZvoDXwUAlIJr0=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references
	:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition
	:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to;
	b=eeqZqlfYch2pPBQWSVt4eBPD5MFTWPZDudj8T6ND/xHWmXkqZNnlK8ybI0iXZHHWAY
	Q5giHYlKMGdUJFi5JHo4mWr5E9sSQ8Jk/RidTtrC+q0VTnkcNpOZIOmdS5NiISOU5XUE
	HwyUfH0j18Td2XZMPtzlWcWNQDLu0ptePq0Fw=
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 00:34:21 +0300
From: Dmitry Chistikov <dd1email@gmail.com>
To: "devel@ where you _can_ ask" <devel-newbies@lists.altlinux.org>
Message-ID: <20101107213421.GD7400@conflux.foliandre>
Mail-Followup-To: "devel@ where you _can_ ask"
	<devel-newbies@lists.altlinux.org>
References: <AANLkTi=QirQaSna+-_zRoFrAAH47x1cWa7NLdmaMpDT7@mail.gmail.com>
	<4CD5E47D.1080508@gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinv=PfptRG9uRHvBW4+Cb1gw6w9U+Gt_PqR0per@mail.gmail.com>
	<4CD5ED25.2040601@gmail.com>
	<AANLkTim1u=NMkcaru=6+w4KbOxu2FZH0Bhze1zab_ncV@mail.gmail.com>
	<20101107174405.GE32601@osdn.org.ua>
	<20101107194056.GC7400@conflux.foliandre>
	<20101107210856.GJ32601@osdn.org.ua>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20101107210856.GJ32601@osdn.org.ua>
Subject: Re: [newbies] patch vs. subst,
 was: Little CMS 2 quick and dirty build
X-BeenThere: devel-newbies@lists.altlinux.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: "devel@ where you _can_ ask" <devel-newbies@lists.altlinux.org>
List-Id: "devel@ where you _can_ ask" <devel-newbies.lists.altlinux.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.altlinux.org/mailman/options/devel-newbies>, 
	<mailto:devel-newbies-request@lists.altlinux.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.altlinux.org/pipermail/devel-newbies>
List-Post: <mailto:devel-newbies@lists.altlinux.org>
List-Help: <mailto:devel-newbies-request@lists.altlinux.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.altlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/devel-newbies>,
	<mailto:devel-newbies-request@lists.altlinux.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Nov 2010 21:31:38 -0000
Archived-At: <http://lore.altlinux.org/devel-newbies/20101107213421.GD7400@conflux.foliandre/>
List-Archive: <http://lore.altlinux.org/devel-newbies/>

> > > Думаю, вместо патча тут лучше subst 's/ccache //', потому как
> > > патч может периодически отваливаться, а апстримить его скорее
> > > смысла нет => пустая трата времени.
> > Стоп, а разве это как раз не преимущество патча?
> 
> Если он существенный (в т.ч. если надо бы апстримить) -- то да.
> В данном конкретном случае не разглядел нужды апстримить.

М-м... а приведенный мной аргумент недостаточен или малосостоятелен?

-- 
Дмитрий Чистиков