From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on sa.int.altlinux.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS autolearn=no version=3.2.5 Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 20:42:55 +0300 From: Michael Shigorin To: "devel@ where you _can_ ask" Message-ID: <20101030174255.GU21965@osdn.org.ua> Mail-Followup-To: "devel@ where you _can_ ask" References: <4CCC1D37.8050200@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <4CCC1D37.8050200@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Re: [newbies] GIMP GAP, repocop warning arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share X-BeenThere: devel-newbies@lists.altlinux.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: "devel@ where you _can_ ask" List-Id: "devel@ where you _can_ ask" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 17:42:10 -0000 Archived-At: List-Archive: On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 05:27:19PM +0400, Yuriy Shirokov wrote: > info Бишь "FYI". > The package has a significant amount of > architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an > architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror > space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of > this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share > is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and > in this case, you should move that data elsewhere.; Насколько понимаю, это отсылка к Debian policy. > Это он из за содержимого /usr/share/locale/ ругается или > действительно ради двух с небольшим мегабайт надо выделять > пакет -data? Ради двух из тридцати двух я бы не морочился. -- ---- WBR, Michael Shigorin ------ Linux.Kiev http://www.linux.kiev.ua/