From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on sa.int.altlinux.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mail.ru; s=mail; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Mime-Version:Message-ID:Date:Content-Type:References:In-Reply-To:To:From:Subject; bh=fBTc3LuufDNBppKyPDDFQf5+qW2pzcGDBnewf/eje54=; b=hnva2qeMK9XtZyUvZMaZ8wC82H2nJCRKyqHXfLqMWPZq5t0DcrQQkg/nEpeqVuCYCxkEtZEtkZE6168dPtnaPsd7gZBHCCsAEXPzE49JZadBU1c/xdH3GM3XsdrHknXx; From: gBopHuk_alt To: "devel@ where you _can_ ask" In-Reply-To: References: <1347827394.9782.11.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1347864258.29165.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1347873638.30026.7.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1347887291.32232.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1347901579.32232.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1347960684.5846.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1347974121.13447.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1348124312.31182.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1348133004.646.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20120920144610.25fc5e6c@deimos.localdomain> <1348158578.3120.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 23:07:42 +0400 Message-ID: <1348168062.3706.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 (2.32.3-alt2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam: Not detected X-Mras: Ok Subject: Re: [newbies] =?koi8-r?b?69TPLc7JwtXE2CDazsHF1CDe1M8g2s7B3snUICJ1bmRl?= =?koi8-r?b?ZmluZWQgcmVmZXJlbmNlIHRvIiDQ0skg08LP0svFPw==?= X-BeenThere: devel-newbies@lists.altlinux.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: "devel@ where you _can_ ask" List-Id: "devel@ where you _can_ ask" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 19:04:23 -0000 Archived-At: List-Archive: В Чтв, 20/09/2012 в 23:37 +0700, Евгений Ростовцев пишет: > А чтобы вообще было хорошо, надо ещё вот это добавить: > > BuildPreReq: pkgconfig(pixman-1) pkgconfig(glproto) > pkgconfig(dri2proto) > BuildPreReq: pkgconfig(xext) pkgconfig(xdamage) pkgconfig(xxf86vm) > BuildPreReq: pkgconfig(xinerama) pkgconfig(xi) pkgconfig(xrandr) > BuildPreReq: pkgconfig(xcursor) pkgconfig(xcomposite) > > А то у нас политика минимизации зависимостей у devel-пакетов подчас > приводит ко всяким несуразностям. Ну ни фига себе !!! А вот с этими BuildPreReq можно поподробнее? Это всё разве pkgconfig-devel, или чего-то там, не подтянет?