From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on sa.local.altlinux.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20251104; t=1787050590; x=1787655390; darn=lists.altlinux.org; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :content-type:mime-version:references:mail-followup-to:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:sender:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to:content-type; bh=DgnEUk2axi+SSGM1JagerKXL540j0qoOu6nDkbXPMLI=; b=gx7JqVGYviKd0XDfbec9ORcyHs3BqEWfE447YHrPr/2p/eyg+7zMXzqElyOrLZpKSA vAQGjNp5jbwKl3ndhAgS6KeRBU/dqCkKiHyukmNEn8N0xoUssWJHwNHwM2NaRuXNyQbe NrKhv3/8wpBlQvRjlVgB5p/69F+C1CHXCo0pZZNxE8+nFdwy4clFQzryryYnGrbalm5y ux+VPFDM5s09xOSKmuDxuZXb8IWy05xkK3yXslUTv8W3WzrIuipkh0GJpYHFpFc1u4UT CENLhqx1X78u2w4zfsYksDADzW7clmgrq/e1tLu3LarmwbjxbJPml8XhlTWvTLrIQQBd Mb8w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1787050590; x=1787655390; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :content-type:mime-version:references:mail-followup-to:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:sender:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to:content-type; bh=DgnEUk2axi+SSGM1JagerKXL540j0qoOu6nDkbXPMLI=; b=hTdNoM3VB7rWcxFm0BpeIjNx3MI6Ig/DnXk1GGbk0P3Bf4Yh/QtqLHsYQtApWKmRpB HDbaQrIN4TrlbJsK6d3nyaJU3WNFP0UbhWfNWG1uHAo736qxVneUdsjDeqqdCDtpwSen oXdkpfIVCj7NERSv7JDoZ7PNNWxVDTwY16ndn4pnRUUlRjvTsgGlggVtCQ2hUS8HjbRO FfbELaZ2VuSWl0TQCzrFOEDr6PyZKDGk0mPjHfyEGe2Da9LCd8cEsK136UQSRXETw926 G0L8AMhI50no35xsR46li3qMJdk8egawnsb4JQmswo7BIlaBjX3A6v/6KnXOAOsN1jpW u9yw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yw3DgfhsfhQJ0QY3gi0YmZLXykyumWsGBPUL7naRjMkB5TN9nIG 1IvbVrRhXb47DqTtCrnZhq8BzI3la9uGoucf7DQx25GgRWpBspgagytI X-Gm-Gg: AR+sD10oGSM91NmxtUOsboa31WXHPVJGAaz3qO3G4beXqfdkDBqCjqwd3M1TxHKF9iX EdBajo+ygqr7l2t3jvYcxreeCRBlivA0wvT6OshrkGXZn52Gnwb0uVLVM/S5iJlgwvogl7jk3x1 hk4Pb1ocBPjng3U2DW0KYfPgECCiKzPZihmI+j0cx5zBRWyT/ahbTKfmrcjYFE21604kzrMmuRR f9Z6Fla3O6fMoUkCQfo3UUzVF0++GTQrPBvaIqKLbT4H77GEqeEXcZWU1w+ByUbLAee4glrQBiP X2Rl6cRg3OXiTfbdwvX304e9+XZY03o4x5YfQdnI7Gsl7ShTTOlZgslQm4SESe8Blgii7F0OKlw QTWsHSPFFRb7DJf+PukvM2nr5VObOXtD8v+b5+LSmJBvDUdxChdNi/dE0ajx2LeZbKSGHekcY9T H5hd5g97dIVSbYXnNzMDkK5hp4PfXsvsNGM4oooWlhfToxU1Rov/KSQM41hzjGgkRPNVZ3JkIIK GhYwx9I X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:3114:b0:495:63e4:7f78 with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-49987971986mr469102145e9.10.1787050590104; Tue, 18 Aug 2026 03:56:30 -0700 (PDT) Sender: "Ivan A. Melnikov" Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2026 14:56:27 +0400 From: "Ivan A. Melnikov" To: Daniil Gnusarev Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Daniil Gnusarev , devel-kernel@lists.altlinux.org References: <20260211084122.353558-1-gnusarevda@basealt.ru> <20260211084122.353558-3-gnusarevda@basealt.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20260211084122.353558-3-gnusarevda@basealt.ru> Cc: devel-kernel@lists.altlinux.org Subject: [d-kernel] =?utf-8?b?0J/QsNGC0YfQuCDQvdCwIGR0cyhpKSDQuCDQuNC30Lw=?= =?utf-8?b?0LXQvdC10L3QuNGPINCyIERUIEJpbmRpbmdzIC8vIHdhczogUmU6ICBbUEFU?= =?utf-8?q?CH_2/7=5D_arm64=3A_dts=3A_rockchip=3A_Add_SPDIF_nodes_to_RK3588?= =?utf-8?q?=28s=29_device_trees?= X-BeenThere: devel-kernel@lists.altlinux.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: ALT Linux kernel packages development List-Id: ALT Linux kernel packages development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2026 10:56:33 -0000 Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: On Wed, Feb 11, 2026 at 12:41:14PM +0400, Daniil Gnusarev wrote: > From: Alexey Charkov > > RK3588s has four SPDIF transmitters, and the full RK3588 has six. > They are software compatible to RK3568 ones. Add respective nodes > to .dtsi files. > > Adapted from vendor sources at [1] and [2], respectively > > [1] https://github.com/rockchip-linux/kernel/blob/develop-5.10/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588s.dtsi > [2] https://github.com/rockchip-linux/kernel/blob/develop-5.10/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588.dtsi Как будто бы вместе с этим патчем надо брать изменения на binding'и[1], иначе в dtbs_check появляются новые ошибки: arch/arm64/boot/dts/edelweiss/rk3588-thin_88rk-1a-001.dtb: spdif-tx@fddb0000 (rockchip,rk3588-spdif): compatible: 'oneOf' conditional failed, one must be fixed: ['rockchip,rk3588-spdif', 'rockchip,rk3568-spdif'] is too long 'rockchip,rk3066-spdif' was expected 'rockchip,rk3228-spdif' was expected 'rockchip,rk3328-spdif' was expected 'rockchip,rk3366-spdif' was expected 'rockchip,rk3368-spdif' was expected 'rockchip,rk3399-spdif' was expected 'rockchip,rk3568-spdif' was expected 'rockchip,rk3588-spdif' is not one of ['rockchip,rk3128-spdif', 'rockchip,rk3188-spdif', 'rockchip,rk3288-spdif', 'rockchip,rk3308-spdif'] from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/sound/rockchip-spdif.yaml Однако я вижу, что по традиции при бекпортировании патчей на dts(i) такого не происходило, и это кажется достаточно разумным, так как изменения в bindings могут приводить к конфликтам при merge (как и любые изменения), а на функциональность они не влияют. Если по этому поводу другие мнения? -- wbr, iv m.