From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on sa.int.altlinux.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS autolearn=no version=3.2.5 From: Sergey To: ALT Linux kernel packages development Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 13:15:41 +0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <20100923013844.GA11996@granary.armor.altlinux.org> <201009231842.40198.a_s_y@sama.ru> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201009271315.41367.a_s_y@sama.ru> Subject: Re: [d-kernel] [cyber] I: 5.1/branch packages: +14 (9653) X-BeenThere: devel-kernel@lists.altlinux.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: ALT Linux kernel packages development List-Id: ALT Linux kernel packages development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 09:15:52 -0000 Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: On Friday 24 September 2010, Anton Protopopov wrote: > Вообще, я не собирался 4.0 трогать. Но если очень нужно, могу попробовать И к 5.1 возвращаясь. Не стоит ли в 5.1 все ядра проапдейтить. std-def, например, без фикса... -- С уважением, Сергей a_s_y@sama.ru