From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 22:19:35 +0400 From: "Konstantin A. Lepikhov" To: ALT Linux Kernel Devel Mailing List Message-ID: <20041022181935.GB5252@lks.home> Mail-Followup-To: ALT Linux Kernel Devel Mailing List Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Operation-System: ALT Linux Sisyphus (20040921) 2.6.8-wks26-up-alt3 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at smtp.elektrostal.ru Subject: [d-kernel] =?koi8-r?b?9yDQz8TExdLWy9U=?= CONFIG_PREEMPT X-BeenThere: devel-kernel@altlinux.ru X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: ALT Linux kernel packages development List-Id: ALT Linux kernel packages development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 18:19:13 -0000 Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: JFYI ----- Forwarded message from Peter Osterlund ----- > now I clear the situation for myself - all this problems is occur when > using kernel with lowlatency patches by Andrew Morton. Maybe Jens know > why its dont work or maybe Andrew ;) I can send kernel Oops and other > data for analyzing to anyone who can make pktcdvd + lowlatency happy. I use 2.6 and CONFIG_PREEMPT and haven't had any problems caused by the preemptible kernel. I think 2.6 + preempt gives you the same advantage as using 2.4 + lowlatency. -- Peter Osterlund - petero2@telia.com http://w1.894.telia.com/~u89404340 ----- End forwarded message ----- -- WBR, Konstantin chat with ==>ICQ: 109916175 Lepikhov, speak to ==>JID: lakostis@jabber.org aka L.A. Kostis write to ==>mailto:lakostis@pisem.net.nospam ...The information is like the bank... (c) EC8OR