From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <at@altlinux.ru>
Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2004 00:03:01 +0300
From: Alexey Tourbin <at@altlinux.ru>
To: devel-kernel@altlinux.ru
Message-ID: <20040131210301.GA30765@solemn.turbinal.org>
Mail-Followup-To: devel-kernel@altlinux.ru
References: <20040131164024.GI30388@master.altlinux.ru>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040131164024.GI30388@master.altlinux.ru>
Subject: [d-kernel] Re: [dawes@XFree86.Org: Re: Announcement: Modification
	to the base XFree86(TM) license.]
X-BeenThere: devel-kernel@altlinux.ru
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4
Precedence: list
Reply-To: ALT Linux kernel packages development <devel-kernel@altlinux.ru>
List-Id: ALT Linux kernel packages development <devel-kernel.altlinux.ru>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://altlinux.ru/mailman/listinfo/devel-kernel>,
	<mailto:devel-kernel-request@altlinux.ru?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </pipermail/devel-kernel>
List-Post: <mailto:devel-kernel@altlinux.ru>
List-Help: <mailto:devel-kernel-request@altlinux.ru?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://altlinux.ru/mailman/listinfo/devel-kernel>,
	<mailto:devel-kernel-request@altlinux.ru?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 21:35:01 -0000
Archived-At: <http://lore.altlinux.org/devel-kernel/20040131210301.GA30765@solemn.turbinal.org/>
List-Archive: <http://lore.altlinux.org/devel-kernel/>
List-Post: <mailto:devel-kernel@altlinux.org>


--n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 07:40:24PM +0300, Anton Farygin wrote:
> From: David Dawes <dawes@XFree86.Org>
> To: devel@xfree86.org

> On looking through the fbdev drivers in the Linux kernel source, I see
> very few cases where license notices from XFree86 driver source are
> included.  This means that either the license for these drivers has no
> impact on the work you are talking about (making what you have written
> above moot), or some authors of portions of the current Linux fbdev code
> have violated the terms of the existing licenses by not including a
> verbatim copy of the copyright, license notice, and disclaimer text in
> relevant source code.

Hi, мне интересно, чем кончится эта дискуссия (и насколько несовместимы
BSD и GPL лицензии в целом).

> I would also like to echo Egbert's comments about the one-way nature of
> your concerns.

--n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAHBgFfBKgtDjnu0YRAtMAAKCeushv/2i6B9JVVUkYs4I1h4r8kwCfdKcR
+ElSvxS+/Y3noRVdHQvIMD4=
=ghw/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1--