From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 18:44:28 +0500 From: Andrey Rahmatullin To: ALT Linux kernel packages development Message-ID: <20040121134428.GB5593@wrars-comp.wrarsdomain> Mail-Followup-To: ALT Linux kernel packages development Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="kORqDWCi7qDJ0mEj" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: ALT Linux Sisyphus (20031103) X-Window-System: 4.3.0 X-Spam-Status: No, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.500001, version=0.12.3 Subject: [d-kernel] gcc version for 2.6 compiling? X-BeenThere: devel-kernel@altlinux.ru X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list Reply-To: ALT Linux kernel packages development List-Id: ALT Linux kernel packages development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 13:46:37 -0000 Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: --kORqDWCi7qDJ0mEj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Каким gcc бум собирать 2.6? По-прежнему 2.96 или 3.3? С одной стороны, - The recommended compiler (for x86) is still 2.95.3. с другой - - When compiled with a modern gcc (Ie gcc 3.x), 2.6 will use additional optimisations that 2.4 didn't. с 3-й - - gcc 2.96 is not supported with CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=y due to a stack pointer handling bug. (правда, мы это не включаем) Все цитаты из post-halloween-2.6.txt -- WBR, wRAR (ALT Linux Team) Можно попробовать; в этом скрипте и так уже есть race. :( -- ldv in devel@ --kORqDWCi7qDJ0mEj Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFADoI8B4Vf7hFmt5URAtx7AKDpL+xdHlotDP/2GIzrdpnsN3b91wCeNWBF AtY1ysD+NaR3lwzDKr7mQKE= =8vwv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --kORqDWCi7qDJ0mEj--