From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on sa.int.altlinux.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS, SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.2.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: "ALT Linux Community general discussions" References: Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 20:36:10 +0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: =?koi8-r?B?98zBxMnNydIg59XTxdc=?= Message-ID: In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Opera Mail/10.10 (Linux) Subject: Re: [Comm] =?koi8-r?b?8cTSzyAyLjYuMzIgLSB1bi1kZWYgySBzdGQtZGVmICsg?= =?koi8-r?b?wtnT1NLPxMXK09TXycU=?= X-BeenThere: community@lists.altlinux.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: ALT Linux Community general discussions List-Id: ALT Linux Community general discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 16:36:17 -0000 Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: > [..] >> Если да - будет ли тогда стабильная сборка 2.6.32 в 5.1? > > Если я правильно понял, kernel-image-rhel-smp должно быть самым > стабильным :) Т.е. это kernel-image-rhel-smp (которое недавно появилось в Branch 5.1) лучше тамошнего 2.6.32 (un-def)? Это официальное мнение? -- С уважением, Владимир Гусев