Re: [Comm] install rpm-build

Re: [Comm] install rpm-build

[Slava Dubrovskiy]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1585 bytes --]

Vladimir Scherbaev пишет:
> Доброго времени суток!
>
> Пытыюсь поставить rpm-build:
> apt-get install rpm-buildReading Package Lists... Done
> Building Dependency Tree... Done
> Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
> requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
> distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
> or been moved out of Incoming.
>
> Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that
> the package is simply not installable and a bug report against
> that package should be filed.
> The following information may help to resolve the situation:
>
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
>   rpm-build: Depends: autoconf but it is not installable
>              Depends: autoconf-common but it is not installable
>              Depends: automake but it is not installable
>              Depends: automake-common but it is not installable
>              Depends: gettext-tools
>              Depends: libtool
>              Depends: rpm-build-perl (>= 0.6.2) but it is not installable
>              Depends: rpm-build-python (>= 0.31) but it is not installable
> E: Broken packages
>
> [root@localhost sources.list.d]# rpm -qa | grep rpm
> librpm-4.0.4-alt95.M41.1
> rpm-4.0.4-alt95.M41.1
> librpmbuild-4.0.4-alt95.M41.1
>
>
> apt нацелен на бранч 4.1
Вы уверены? Покажите source.list
>
> В чем может быть проблема?
apt-get update делали?

-- 
WBR,
Dubrovskiy Vyacheslav


[-- Attachment #2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature, Size: 3262 bytes --]

Re: [Comm] install rpm-build

[Andrey Rahmatullin]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 552 bytes --]

On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 08:18:14PM +0400, Vladimir Scherbaev wrote:
> >> apt нацелен на бранч 4.1
> > Вы уверены? Покажите source.list
> >> В чем может быть проблема?
> > apt-get update делали?
> Делали.
Почему вы отвечаете выборочно?

-- 
WBR, wRAR (ALT Linux Team)
Powered by the ALT Linux fortune(8):

> > где написано сколько предварительных релизов будет?
> наверно, их будет столько, сколько потребуется - теоретически,
> вплоть до бесконечности ;)
есть мнение, что у данной бесконечности намечен Дед Лайн
		-- mike in sisyphus@

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

Re: [Comm] install rpm-build

[Denis Nazarov]

В сообщении от Friday 08 August 2008 22:36:39 Vladimir Scherbaev 
написал(а):
> rpm ftp://ftp.altlinux.ru/pub/distributions/ALTLinux/4.1/branch/ i586
> classic

а rpm ftp://ftp.altlinux.ru/pub/distributions/ALTLinux/4.1/branch/ noarch 
classic 
где?

Re: [Comm] install rpm-build

[Mikhail Gusarov]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 321 bytes --]

Twas brillig at 20:44:42 08.08.2008 UTC+04 when zemik3@volgograd.ru did gyre and gimble:

 >> а rpm ftp://ftp.altlinux.ru/pub/distributions/ALTLinux/4.1/branch/ noarch
 >> classic
 >> где?

 VS> Думается, что это не обязательно. Или все же?

Обязательно.

-- 

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 196 bytes --]

Re: [Comm] install rpm-build

[Denis Nazarov]

В сообщении от Friday 08 August 2008 22:44:42 Vladimir Scherbaev 
написал(а):
> 8 августа 2008 г. 20:39 пользователь Denis Nazarov 
<marsden@mail.ru>написал:
> > В сообщении от Friday 08 August 2008 22:36:39 Vladimir Scherbaev
> >
> > написал(а):
> > > rpm ftp://ftp.altlinux.ru/pub/distributions/ALTLinux/4.1/branch/
> > > i586 classic
> >
> > а rpm ftp://ftp.altlinux.ru/pub/distributions/ALTLinux/4.1/branch/
> > noarch classic
> > где?
>
> Думается, что это не обязательно. Или все же?

у меня бранч выкачан на винт. Смотрим...

[denis@buka ~]$ ls /home/ALT/branch/noarch/RPMS.classic/ |grep autoconf
autoconf_2.13-2.13-alt9.noarch.rpm
autoconf_2.50-2.59-alt9.noarch.rpm
autoconf_2.60-2.61-alt4.noarch.rpm
autoconf-common-0.2-alt1.noarch.rpm
[denis@buka ~]$ ls /home/ALT/branch/noarch/RPMS.classic/ |grep dettext
[denis@buka ~]$ ls /home/ALT/branch/noarch/RPMS.classic/ |grep libtool
[denis@buka ~]$ ls /home/ALT/branch/noarch/RPMS.classic/ |grep ^rpm
rpm-build-compat-0.99-alt1.noarch.rpm
rpm-build-docs-0.4.5-alt11.noarch.rpm
rpm-build-docs-experimental-0.4-alt1.noarch.rpm
rpm-build-erlang-0.2.1-alt1.noarch.rpm
rpm-build-firefox-2.0.0.15-alt0.M41.2.noarch.rpm
rpm-build-fonts-0.3-alt1.noarch.rpm
rpm-build-fpc-2.1-alt2.noarch.rpm
rpm-build-gnome-0.9-alt1.noarch.rpm
rpm-build-haskell-1-alt4.noarch.rpm
rpm-build-java-1.0.0-alt1.noarch.rpm
rpm-build-kernel-0.99.0-alt1.noarch.rpm
rpm-build-licenses-1.0-alt2.noarch.rpm
rpm-build-linux-ha-0.3-alt1.noarch.rpm
rpm-build-mono-1.3.2-alt1.noarch.rpm
rpm-build-moodle-1.0-alt1.noarch.rpm
rpm-build-ocaml-1.1.1-alt1.noarch.rpm
rpm-build-pear-0.3-alt1.noarch.rpm
rpm-build-pecl-0.2-alt1.noarch.rpm
rpm-build-perl-0.6.7-alt1.noarch.rpm
rpm-build-php-4.4.8-alt1.noarch.rpm
rpm-build-php5-5.2.5-alt1.noarch.rpm
rpm-build-python-0.33-alt1.1.noarch.rpm
rpm-build-python-tools-0.33-alt1.1.noarch.rpm
rpm-build-ruby-0.0.2-alt1.noarch.rpm
rpm-build-seamonkey-1.0.6-alt1.noarch.rpm
rpm-build-spec2macro-0.2-alt1.noarch.rpm
rpm-build-sunbird-0.7.0-alt2.noarch.rpm
rpm-build-tcl-0.4-alt1.noarch.rpm
rpm-build-thunderbird-2.0.0.12-alt1.noarch.rpm
rpm-build-xfce4-0.0.1-alt0.1.noarch.rpm
rpmdevtools-6.4-alt1.1.noarch.rpm
rpmuncovered-0.3-alt2.noarch.rpm
rpmwrap-0.20060510-alt1.noarch.rpm
[denis@buka ~]$

как вы думаете - необязательно подключать noarch ?