From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <46E65532.1080805@altlinux.ru> Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 12:43:30 +0400 From: Anton Gorlov User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ALT Linux Community general discussions References: <46E64F90.4070901@altlinux.ru> <200709111227.06479.ashen@nsrz.ru> <46E6523B.9040704@altlinux.ru> <20070911083306.GA6096@ricom.ru> In-Reply-To: <20070911083306.GA6096@ricom.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: -3.0 (---) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "mail.espenza.ru", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see The administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Alexey Morsov пишет: > On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 12:30:51PM +0400, Anton Gorlov wrote: >> Лишняя прослойка. Да и при такой нагрузке... примерно в 400-600МБИТ >> поткои бывают.. юзать xinetd как-то не интересно. > зато секьюрней. и чем же оно секурнее? Я пока вижу в данной ситуации лишнее место сбоя для себя... [...] Content analysis details: (-3.0 points, 7.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.7 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -2.3 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 1.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-Spam-Score2: -3.0 (---) Subject: Re: [Comm] vsftp X-BeenThere: community@lists.altlinux.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: ALT Linux Community general discussions List-Id: ALT Linux Community general discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 08:44:04 -0000 Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: Alexey Morsov пишет: > On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 12:30:51PM +0400, Anton Gorlov wrote: >> Лишняя прослойка. Да и при такой нагрузке... примерно в 400-600МБИТ >> поткои бывают.. юзать xinetd как-то не интересно. > зато секьюрней. и чем же оно секурнее? Я пока вижу в данной ситуации лишнее место сбоя для себя...