From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 11:00:25 +0200 From: Maxim Tyurin To: community@altlinux.ru Subject: Re: [Comm] =?koi8-r?B?0sHT09nMy8E=?= ;((( Message-ID: <20031219090025.GD2681@mrkooll.tdr.pibhe.com> Mail-Followup-To: community@altlinux.ru References: <3FE2BC59.4080903@oilbase.chelny.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Q0rSlbzrZN6k9QnT" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3FE2BC59.4080903@oilbase.chelny.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Keywords: 534748031 X-PGP-KeyID: 4A101D3B X-Request-PGP: x-hkp://wwwkeys.nl.pgp.net X-BeenThere: community@altlinux.ru X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.3 Precedence: list Reply-To: community@altlinux.ru List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 09:00:32 -0000 Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: --Q0rSlbzrZN6k9QnT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 11:52:41AM +0300, Nick wrote: > Это у меня только так или еще у кого-нить? > ruleset=check_relay, arg1=umail.mtu.ru, arg2=195.34.32.101, > relay=umail.mtu.ru [195.34.32.101], reject=550 5.7.1 Mail from > 195.34.32.101 rejected, see http://spamcop.net/bl.shtml?195.34.32.101 > Dec 19 11:48:59 oilbase sendmail[21180]: hBJ8mnvk021180: --- 550 5.7.1 > Mail from 195.34.32.101 rejected, see > http://spamcop.net/bl.shtml?195.34.32.101 Отсюда вывод - не пользоваться blacklists (кроме теч что сам составил). Единственный ИМХО нормальный ORDB.org и то потому что он только на open relay проверяет. -- With Best Regards, Maxim Tyurin JID: MrKooll@jabber.pibhe.com --Q0rSlbzrZN6k9QnT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/4r4p9GgyV0oQHTsRAjHvAKDYGsEwwbqYeuf76g8Y2za3b8oygACfa75f x7bXcOTgrr170AwnPCM5J34= =BttL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Q0rSlbzrZN6k9QnT--