From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dikov@imbg.org.ua>
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="windows-1251"
From: Dmitry Kovalsky <dikov@imbg.org.ua>
Organization: IMBG
To: community@altlinux.ru
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 13:32:20 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <200210311332.20278.dikov@imbg.org.ua>
X-AVP-RU: Passed
Subject: [Comm] Kmail =?windows-1251?b?7+Xw5e3u8fs=?=
Sender: community-admin@altlinux.ru
Errors-To: community-admin@altlinux.ru
X-BeenThere: community@altlinux.ru
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: community@altlinux.ru
X-Reply-To: dikov@imbg.org.ua
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.altlinux.ru/mailman/listinfo/community>,
	<mailto:community-request@altlinux.ru?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <community.altlinux.ru>
List-Post: <mailto:community@altlinux.ru>
List-Help: <mailto:community-request@altlinux.ru?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.altlinux.ru/mailman/listinfo/community>,
	<mailto:community-request@altlinux.ru?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.altlinux.ru/pipermail/community/>
Archived-At: <http://lore.altlinux.org/community/200210311332.20278.dikov@imbg.org.ua/>
List-Archive: <http://lore.altlinux.org/community/>
List-Post: <mailto:mandrake-russian@linuxteam.iplabs.ru>

=EF=F0=E8=E2=E5=F2 =E2=F1=E5=EC=20

=EF=EE=F7=E5=EC=F3 =EA=EE=E3=E4=E0 =FF =E2 =F0=E0=F1=F1=FB=EB=EA=F3 =EE=F2=
=E2=E5=F7=E0=FE,
=F2=EE =EF=EE=F2=EE=EC =EC=EE=E9 =EE=F2=E2=E5=F2 =E2=E8=E4=E8=FC=F2=F1=FF
 =F1 =F2=E0=EA=E8=EC=E8 =EF=E5=F0=E5=ED=EE=F1=E0=EC=E8:=20

 My suggestion is that in case of 0.15 water shell removal (16 waters) th=
e=3D
=3D20
system remain more tight (and may be more viscous) than in case of 0.3 (4=
=3D
10=3D20
waters) . Taking into account that it is quite little with respect to ove=
=3D
rall=3D20

=DD=F2=EE =EC=EE=ED=E0 =EA=E0=EA=F2=EE =E8=F1=EF=F0=E0=E2=E8=F2=FC?



=C4=E8=EC=E0

E-mail: dikov@imbg.org.ua
Fax:  +380 (44) 266-0759
Tel.: +380 (44) 266-5589