From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Michael Shigorin To: ALT Linux Message-ID: <20020120093228.GB1569@lic145.kiev.ua> Mail-Followup-To: ALT Linux Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i Subject: [mdk-re] [JT] Fwd: Re: [Nautilus-list] [BUG] nautilus wreaks CD/doors! Sender: mandrake-russian-admin@altlinux.ru Errors-To: mandrake-russian-admin@altlinux.ru X-BeenThere: mandrake-russian@altlinux.ru X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: mandrake-russian@altlinux.ru List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Linux-Mandrake RE / ALT Linux discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Sun Jan 20 12:54:17 2002 X-Original-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 11:32:28 +0200 Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: ----- Forwarded message from Darin Adler ----- Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2002 23:57:25 -0800 From: Darin Adler To: Owen Taylor Subject: Re: [Nautilus-list] [BUG] nautilus wreaks CD/doors! User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.0.0.1331 Cc: Michael Shigorin , Nautilus On 1/19/02 12:54 PM, "Owen Taylor" wrote: > (For nautilus to eject the drive when it isn't the party that unmounts > it strikes me as prettty dubious.) I agree. I guess I don't really know what the current Nautilus code does or why. This was an area of Nautilus that I stayed out of during 1.0 development. Maybe there's some quick surgery we can do to get rid of this behavior without causing any other damage. If I don't get a patch for this in the next few days I'll tackle it myself. -- Darin ----- End forwarded message ----- -- ---- WBR, Michael Shigorin ------ http://visa.chem.univ.kiev.ua/~mike/