From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Mikhail Zabaluev To: ALT Linux Team Message-ID: <20020117200216.GB2263@mhz.mikhail.zabaluev.name> Mail-Followup-To: Mikhail Zabaluev , ALT Linux Team References: <16544778868.20020116034914@mtu-net.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <16544778868.20020116034914@mtu-net.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i Subject: [mdk-re] Re: encodings files Sender: mandrake-russian-admin@altlinux.ru Errors-To: mandrake-russian-admin@altlinux.ru X-BeenThere: mandrake-russian@altlinux.ru X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: mandrake-russian@altlinux.ru List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Linux-Mandrake RE / ALT Linux discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Thu Jan 17 23:01:17 2002 X-Original-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 23:02:16 +0300 Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: Hello Serge, On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 03:49:14AM +0300, Serge Skorokhodov wrote: > > Здравствуйте! > > Для руссификации grace потребовался > файл с encoding в формате: > > This describes the ISOLatin1Encoding. > It differs slightly from what the PostScript interpreter defines. > Please note that there is no unique definition for the > charactername appearing at 45 (dec) in ISO 8859-1. > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Encoding=ISOLatin1Encoding /* The name of the encoding scheme */ > .notdef /* '000 000 "00 */ > .notdef /* '001 001 "01 */ > .notdef /* '002 002 "02 */ > .notdef /* '003 003 "03 */ > .notdef /* '004 004 "04 */ > .notdef /* '005 005 "05 */ > .notdef /* '006 006 "06 */ > .notdef /* '007 007 "07 */ > ...................................... > > Как бы с небольшими трудозатратами:) такие получить для > кириллических кодировок? Была бы grace с кириллицей (так, по > крайней мере, обещает хелп:) Может, проще научить grace пользоваться iconv? -- Stay tuned, MhZ JID: mookid@jabber.org ___________ Did you know that if you took all the economists in the world and lined them up end to end, they'd still point in the wrong direction?