* [mdk-re] LWN -- молчание?
@ 2002-01-13 14:35 Michael Shigorin
2002-01-23 19:52 ` Alexandre Prokoudine
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Michael Shigorin @ 2002-01-13 14:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ALT Linux
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 547 bytes --]
Здравствуйте.
Господа, дошли ли в рассылку мои письма насчет LWN Distribution
Survey? Фидбэк тождественно равен нулю.
Они (lwn.net) собираются обновить список дистрибутивов где-то к
концу месяца; учитывая, что это *примерно* совпадает с ожидаемым
событием, хотелось бы создать (не) лишний publicity.
Также, по-моему, имеет смысл завести проекты на freshmeat.net и,
вохможно, distrowatch.com (надо рассмотреть повнимательнее).
Жду комментариев.
--
---- WBR, Michael Shigorin <mike@altlinux.ru>
------ http://visa.chem.univ.kiev.ua/~mike/
[-- Attachment #1.2: lwn-alt --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 11679 bytes --]
LWN DISTRIBUTION SURVEY
version 0.32
The LWN distribution survey is a tool to gather comparable
information about Linux distributions. All provided surveys
will be made publicly available in their entirety. They
are dated, so that multiple versions of a survey for a
specific distribution can exist, providing historical
information.
______________________________________________________________________________
Survey Date:
Jan 13 2002
Name of person providing information:
Michael Shigorin
E-mail address:
mike@altlinux.ru
Connection with this distribution:
(note, survey information from distribution creators/developers
will replace information from other interested parties, wherever
available.)
Slightly participating in development
1. What is the name of your distribution?
ALT Linux
What is the website for your distribution?
http://altlinux.ru (in Russian),
2. What is the derivation of your distribution?
_ SLS
_ Slackware
_ Jurix
_ Red Hat
_ Debian
_ rolled from scratch
X other (Please name)
Linux-Mandrake
2a. If you answered anything besides "rolled from scratch", do
you still consider your distribution "tied" to its derivation,
e.g., you release updates to your distribution based on updates
from the original distribution?
No
2b. If you answered "rolled from scratch" or other,
do you use a package management system?
If yes, which one?
RPM3 in released distributions; now switching to RPM4
plus APT (Conectiva apt/rpm port)
3. What languages do you support? Please list, including English,
if appropriate.
All that Mandrake 8 supported. Special emphasis
is made on correct i18n.
-- or --
English, Russian, Belarussian, Ukrainian as primary concern
????
4. Would you classify your distribution as a "mini"-distribution?
(This is a very flexible term, covering Linux distributions
sized for a floppy or smaller, up through CD or disk-based
Linux distributions that are on the small size. It is more a
matter of perception, in terms of whether you define the
distribution partially by its small size compared to generic
distributions like Debian, Red Hat, et al.)
_ yes
X no
4a. If you answered yes to the above, please mark any of the
following that are applicable:
_ CD-based, e.g., intended to be booted from and run directly
from a CD without requiring a hard disk.
_ Disk-based, small, but intended to be run from a hard disk.
Presumably too large for a floppy.
_ Floppy-based
How many floppies for the base distribution?
How many floppies for supported add-ons?
_ Flash-disk-based
_ Other
Please explain:
5. Hardware Support. Please mark all the hardware platforms that
your distribution supports.
_ Alpha
_ ARM
_ IBM S/390
X Intel x86/Pentium
_ IA64
_ NEC Mobile Gear PDAs
_ Sparc
_ Sparc64
_ PowerPC
_ PowerPC G4
_ RS/6000
_ Microcontrollers
_ Other, please list:
5a. For what hardware platforms do you provide optimized binaries,
if any?
i586
6. Why did you decide to produce a Linux distribution?
Originally it was Linux-Mandrake Russian Edition by
IPLabs Linux Team, but not all significant changes found
their way back to Mandrake and the team went stronger.
Now there's a line of distributions targeted towards different
audiences ranging from beginners to highly experienced administrators.
7. What is the target audience for your distribution?
There are 3 distinct distributions really:
- generic distribution aimed at wide range of applications
former Linux-Mandrake Russian Edition
upcoming Master 1.0
- desktop and multimedia for beginners
Junior-1.0, 1.1
(with more planned)
- server-oriented RSBAC-based solution
upcoming Castle
Each and every of them is based on common unstable/current repository
(Sisyphus). APT is used to deal with update/upgrade issues.
8. Would you consider your distribution to be:
X general purpose, e.g., useful for servers, desktops, and
requiring tailoring for specific purposes.
(talking of generic branch)
X special purpose, e.g., specifically tailored for a single
functionality or a small group of functionalities.
(as for Junior and Castle)
8a. If you consider your distribution to be special purpose,
below are a list of possible purposes. Please check all that
apply and add any that are missing:
X Appliances, such as:
X Communications Server
X Router/Firewall
X Web Cache
X DOS/Windows support, via:
X DOS partition
X DOS/Windows install, separate boot
_ Windows Users, accessible from Windows
_ Diskless Terminal support
X Education/Schools
X Ease-of-use, for non-technical users
_ Embedded Systems
_ High-end and Cluster computing
X Non-exportable crytographic support
_ Older, slower hardware (pre-Pentium, for example)
X Optimized performance
_ Reduced memory usage
X Rescue disk
X Security
_ Targeted user market, such as:
_ ISPs
_ E-commerce sites
_ Highly Experienced, Technical users
_ Physically challenged
X other
9. Who are the primary developers for your distribution?
Please provide email addresses.
Dmitry V. Levin <ldv@alt-linux.org>
Sergey Vlasov <vsu@altlinux.ru>
Sergie Pugachev <fd_rag@altlinux.ru>
Sergey V Turchin <zerg@altlinux.ru>
Stanislav Ievlev <inger@altlinux.ru>
Aleksey Smirnov <smi@altlinux.ru>
Alexander Bokovoy <ab@altlinux.ru>
Alexey Novodvorsky (AEN) <aen@altlinux.ru>
Anton Farygin (Rider) <rider@altlinux.ru>
Konstantin Volckov <goldhead@altlinux.ru>
Kostya Timoshenko <kt@altlinux.ru>
Alexey Voinov <vns@altlinux.ru>
Sergey Bolshakov <sbolshakov@altlinux.ru>
Mikhail Zabaluev <mhz@alt-linux.org>
Grigory Milev <week@altlinux.ru>
Sergei Aranovsky <sa@altlinux.ru>
S. Budnevitch <svb@altlinux.ru>
Ivan Zakharyaschev <imz@altlinux.ru>
Lev Levitin <lev@altlinux.ru>
Peter Novodvorsky <nidd@altlinux.ru>
Yury Zotov <yz@altlinux.ru>
[????] Дмитрий Левин: источник -- Ваше письмо в -devel насчет ключей для подписи
пакетов в devel от Jun 19 2001.
9a. How many developers in total are working on the distribution?
at least 25.
????
9b. How many of these developers are working full-time?
10 (counting people from official ALT Linux Team)
????
10. Is there a packaged or commercial version of your distribution
for sale? if so, please gives the names and URL's of the
company or companies that provide it.
Yes, every distribution can be ordered on CDs (even unstable snapshots)
as well as downloaded; Castle and generic distribution (upcoming Master
1.0) are supposed to get official support for boxed versions.
It can be ordered at http://bolero.ru Internet shop, as well as
purchased at a number of local software/hardware stores.
Russian page on this topic is: http://altlinux.ru/?module=buy-inet .
11. What other Linux distributions do you consider to be
most similar in design goals and target audience?
Linux-Mandrake, ASP Linux (http://asplinux.ru)
12. What version of the kernel are you currently shipping?
Patched 2.4.17.
13. What C libraries are you supporting:
_ a.out
_ glibc
X glibc2
13a. Which C library is the default for your builds? (Check only one):
(Note, we have distributions on the list whose primary reason
for existing is to support older libraries -- this is meant to
be a check for such a distribution).
_ a.out (libc4)
_ glibc (libc5)
X glibc2 (libc6)
14. How large is your default installation?
Depends on free disk space and distribution. Minimal
installation of generic/desktop is ~ 150--200Mb
????
15. How many packages are provided, including both default and
optional packages?
Sisyphus-20020106 has 1646 source and 2429 binary packages, plus some
unsupported ones.
16. Is there a paid support service available?
Yes. Boxed Castle will include support in retail price.
17. If appropriate, in what area, geographically, are the
developers and/or company located?
The headquarters are situated in Moscow, Russia.
18. When was your distribution first made available on the
Internet?
Near to Linux-Mandrake 6.0.
18a. If it is available on CD, when was it first made available on CD?
The same time
18c. When was it first publicly announced?
????
19. Do you have any documentable statistics on usage that you
could share? Such as downloads, commercial box sales, etc.
????
20. Does this distribution conform to the Linux Standards Base
as published so far or the File Hierarchy Standard?
Yes
????
20a. If your distribution only partially conforms with the
LSB/FHS, please describe what portions it conforms with
and in what instances it does not conform (and why, if
you wish to give that background).
21. Please provide information on any public mailing lists you
provide for general user support (including URLs, archive
sites, instructions, etc.)
Mandrake-russian mailing list
Mandrake-russian@altlinux.ru
http://altlinux.ru/mailman/listinfo/mandrake-russian
http://www.altlinux.ru/pipermail/mandrake-russian
Castle mailing list
Castle@altlinux.ru
http://altlinux.ru/mailman/listinfo/castle
http://www.altlinux.ru/pipermail/castle
Sisyphus mailing list
Sisyphus@altlinux.ru
http://altlinux.ru/mailman/listinfo/sisyphus
http://www.altlinux.ru/pipermail/sisyphus
Lists are conducted in Russian.
22. Please provide information on any public mailing lists that
follow the development of your distribution (including URLs,
archive sites, instructions, etc.).
devel@linux.iplabs.ru (in Russian, too)
http://www.altlinux.ru/pipermail/devel
????
22. Optional Formal Description:
ALT Linux distributions are RPM-based snapshots of its main product --
Sisyphus package repository, its unstable/current branch.
The development focus is to bring quality products to diverse user
categories, making starting using Linux easy while helping in making
addressing complex problems possible. One of core features of that
kind is employing APT-RPM to ease system administration.
????
23. Optional Comments (to provide information not covered above):
Distributions can be characterized as well-planned and technological;
some local oddities (as suppressing daily work under root account)
regularly cause disgruntled users who are surprised with root not being
able to receive mail or build packages -- but those same users thank
authors after being accustomed to those oddities :)
Also the project tends to be a "magnet" for various other developments,
providing means to communicate (and hosting). As such it reminds a kind
of RPM-based semi-commercial Debian -- all development is done on open
basis, causing the community to grow steadily.
????
24. Survey Comments (e.g., questions you think we should have asked
or suggested improvements for the existing questions):
These days most non-specialized distros have different branches
or shipments (say RH has plain, Pro, Deluxe, Enterprise) -- how and when
should these be reported as different distributions or as one with
variations?
????
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 232 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [mdk-re] LWN -- молчание?
2002-01-13 14:35 [mdk-re] LWN -- молчание? Michael Shigorin
@ 2002-01-23 19:52 ` Alexandre Prokoudine
2002-01-23 20:37 ` [mdk-re] Re: (ALT!!) " Michael Shigorin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Alexandre Prokoudine @ 2002-01-23 19:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mandrake-russian
On Sun, 13 Jan 2002 13:29:41 +0200
Michael Shigorin <mike@lic145.kiev.ua> wrote:
> Здравствуйте.
> Господа, дошли ли в рассылку мои письма насчет LWN Distribution
> Survey?
Дошли
> Фидбэк тождественно равен нулю.
1:0 в пользу лени :)
>
> Они (lwn.net) собираются обновить список дистрибутивов где-то к
> концу месяца; учитывая, что это *примерно* совпадает с ожидаемым
> событием, хотелось бы создать (не) лишний publicity.
>
> Также, по-моему, имеет смысл завести проекты на freshmeat.net и,
> вохможно, distrowatch.com (надо рассмотреть повнимательнее).
>
> Жду комментариев.
Если не ошибаюсь, там была какая-то анкета ...
Тут весь интерес-то в том, что никогда не знаешь, чего ожидать от
ALT :)
Дистрибутивов-то несколько, а значит, надо составлять несколько
анкет, как я понимаю. К тому же, Junior на дисках выходит без src
(хотя они есть на FTP), а для 1.2 планируется отдельный
девелоперский диск ...
Короче, надо непосредственных сотрудников ALT раскачивать. А так,
анкетку-то заполнить - не беда :)))
--
Regards,
AP
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [mdk-re] Re: (ALT!!) LWN -- молчание?
2002-01-23 19:52 ` Alexandre Prokoudine
@ 2002-01-23 20:37 ` Michael Shigorin
2002-01-23 20:42 ` Aleksey Novodvorsky
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Michael Shigorin @ 2002-01-23 20:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mandrake-russian
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 619 bytes --]
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 11:18:52AM +0300, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
> 1:0 в пользу лени :)
%(
(впрочем, это уже все же второй ответ)
> > Они (lwn.net) собираются обновить список дистрибутивов где-то к
> Если не ошибаюсь, там была какая-то анкета ...
Была. Уже порядком (но не настолько, чтобы можно было сделать по
копии и заполнять дистрибутивозависимо).
> Короче, надо непосредственных сотрудников ALT раскачивать. А так,
> анкетку-то заполнить - не беда :)))
Еще как беда... Молчат, что, впрочем, понятно (LA).
--
---- WBR, Michael Shigorin <mike@altlinux.ru>
------ http://visa.chem.univ.kiev.ua/~mike/
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 232 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [mdk-re] Re: (ALT!!) LWN -- молчание?
2002-01-23 20:37 ` [mdk-re] Re: (ALT!!) " Michael Shigorin
@ 2002-01-23 20:42 ` Aleksey Novodvorsky
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Aleksey Novodvorsky @ 2002-01-23 20:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mandrake-russian
Michael Shigorin wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 11:18:52AM +0300, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
> > 1:0 в пользу лени :)
> %(
>
> (впрочем, это уже все же второй ответ)
>
> > > Они (lwn.net) собираются обновить список дистрибутивов где-то к
> > Если не ошибаюсь, там была какая-то анкета ...
> Была. Уже порядком (но не настолько, чтобы можно было сделать по
> копии и заполнять дистрибутивозависимо).
Михаил, Вы не туда писали. напишите smi, пожалуйста! И извините нас....
Rgdrs, Алексей
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-01-23 20:42 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-01-13 14:35 [mdk-re] LWN -- молчание? Michael Shigorin
2002-01-23 19:52 ` Alexandre Prokoudine
2002-01-23 20:37 ` [mdk-re] Re: (ALT!!) " Michael Shigorin
2002-01-23 20:42 ` Aleksey Novodvorsky
ALT Linux Community general discussions
This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:
git clone --mirror http://lore.altlinux.org/community/0 community/git/0.git
# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
public-inbox-init -V2 community community/ http://lore.altlinux.org/community \
mandrake-russian@linuxteam.iplabs.ru community@lists.altlinux.org community@lists.altlinux.ru community@lists.altlinux.com
public-inbox-index community
Example config snippet for mirrors.
Newsgroup available over NNTP:
nntp://lore.altlinux.org/org.altlinux.lists.community
AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git