From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on sa.local.altlinux.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Virus-Scanned: SPAM Filter at disroot.org Mime-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=disroot.org; s=mail; t=1642307836; bh=VFffmi3I5vVZR1s+uGmV7psRxCp63haIIEUh/MDOY5U=; h=Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:References; b=PCBJ2HV3K61LiDszQ705t2ifcb1iuuRt3mTQqIuRRscDoY25dAH8mLqwEvUNaEfPn QjdFJxrCQ/fmc+x2Sf51RG9MYiHI3aHPNRp63SbfbAmPCvrs2rjVaja2xhX61ltjYJ dyrx4DjqFv6bVm7rVnB1FITPhLZ8IbziAI5EndU7WHO5m5cYeN6YjhH9X/WcigMW5f CC+iQvgz8cOcUNvLbutpqQAciF4PBE3RUEn7ik6KLCgITETEospMhfzmYMQORW8oEg +T2JNouV/dJAKZzqYmsMYRjU89jpm6DmiJZLaOZ456SILtCG4wOU+8iq9EwG53rKub UAc+DIrOaoDxQ== Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2022 04:37:16 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: "David" Message-ID: To: "ALT Linux users (in English only)" In-Reply-To: <20220115224457.GA2869@imap.altlinux.org> References: <20220115224457.GA2869@imap.altlinux.org> <5af43896-f15b-e96a-3eb4-a1ef2dfc4882@vivaldi.net> <20220115215319.GC23056@imap.altlinux.org> Subject: Re: [Comm-en] Flatpak support X-BeenThere: community-en@lists.altlinux.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: "ALT Linux users \(in English only\)" List-Id: "ALT Linux users \(in English only\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2022 04:37:20 -0000 Archived-At: List-Archive: January 15, 2022 4:45 PM, "Michael Shigorin" wrote: > On Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 12:53:20AM +0300, Michael Shigorin wrote: >=20 >=20Our GNOME maintainer replied already, my translation: >=20 >=20--- > The guy tells that gnome-software doesn't show flatpaks that > can be installed but only those already installed via console. > It's not this way in sisyphus. I don't know what's up in p10. >=20 >=20Recommend him to try sisyphus-based regular builds, maybe many > of his problems get cured, including attachments in evolution > installed through flatpak (but why not use distribution's one?) > --- >=20 >=20Note that Sisyphus is quite solid for an unstable development > repository but it *can* result in a major PITA or two a year, > in my experience (as in "X broke, need to mess around / fix > or downgrade and hold"). You can try it via LiveCDs though: > http://en.altlinux.org/regular >=20 Michael, Do=20you think this suggestion would work at fixing the bug I have with p= 9 GNUStep's Synaptic? This is the bug that displays the unreadable text = I see at the end of the package installation process (that I mentioned in= my review). Or, is p9 too old to work properly with the Sisyphus reposi= tories, without breaking something? David.