From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <40F64F51.7010704@altlinux.ru> Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 13:33:05 +0400 From: Egor Grebnev Organization: ALT Linux Co. User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.6 (X11/20040511) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: community-en@altlinux.org Subject: Re: [Comm-en] OpenOffice 1.1.0 for Compact 2.3 in English References: <10293462.1089675251777.JavaMail.mark_donahue@mac.com> <20040713052127.GP20983@osdn.org.ua> <1089706187.1980.4.camel@smilingface.rusrating.ru> In-Reply-To: <1089706187.1980.4.camel@smilingface.rusrating.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: community-en@altlinux.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: community-en@altlinux.org List-Id: "Mailing list for ALT Linux users \(in English only\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 09:24:54 -0000 Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: Hello Richard! We are currently working on that. Hopefully, the English build will be ready within a month. Richard Hainsworth wrote: >I want to add my support for this idea. > >I need to work in Russian and English for my business. But I find it >difficult to understand the help and the menu translations and would >prefer the original English. > >I tried to get the original version to work with Russian, but found that >difficult. > >If AltLinux had a version that recognises Russian Word formats and had >an English interface, it would be a competitive advantage for Western >companies working in Russia that want Linux. > >Richard > >On Āņš, 2004-07-13 at 08:21 +0300, Michael Shigorin wrote: > > >>On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 01:34:11AM +0200, Mark Donahue wrote: >> >> >>>Just one question for the moment: Are there any plans to >>>release an OpenOffice 1.1.0 package with English localisation? >>> >>> >>This question is being asked for some time; I for one am >>interested in another localization, but after some hints from >>packager still haven't got around to looking into it... >> >>