From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on sa.int.altlinux.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=no version=3.2.5 Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 19:31:56 -0600 From: Virtual Sky Solutions To: community-en@lists.altlinux.org Message-id: <200902231931.56647.virtualsky.sk@gmail.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=1.12.7400:2.4.4, 1.2.40, 4.0.166 definitions=2009-02-24_02:2009-02-10, 2009-02-24, 2009-02-23 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=5.0.0-0811170000 definitions=main-0902230213 Subject: [Comm-en] ALT Server 4.0 - Setting up a webserver X-BeenThere: community-en@lists.altlinux.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10b3 Precedence: list Reply-To: virtualsky.sk@gmail.com, "ALT Linux users \(in English only\)" List-Id: "ALT Linux users \(in English only\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 01:31:07 -0000 Archived-At: List-Archive: I've just done a test install of ALT Linux 4.0 and I have a couple questions. Hopefully someone in this mailing list can give me some advice. I've successfully done a default install and have been learning my way around the HTTP interface. Now I want to set-up a webpage server, but I haven't been able to identify where, in the ALT Server HTTP interface, to do this. So, what I've done is a manual apt-get install of lighttpd and ran it via the command line. Everything seems to work fine, however, I would like to know if there was something I could have done via the HTTP interface to do this (even if it were Apache and not Lighttpd). Command line is fine, but if there was a more user friendly option I would have used it. Any recommendations? Is there somewhere in the HTTP system interface that I missed? David.