From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <mike@fly.osdn.org.ua>
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2007 23:04:26 +0200
From: Michael Shigorin <mike@osdn.org.ua>
To: community-en@lists.altlinux.org
Message-ID: <20071109210426.GI7939@osdn.org.ua>
Mail-Followup-To: community-en@lists.altlinux.org
References: <200711091456.03162.daniel.rocher@adella.org>
	<20071109172301.GA31932@basalt.office.altlinux.org>
	<4734B008.2080401@altlinux.org>
	<200711092121.38626.daniel.rocher@adella.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200711092121.38626.daniel.rocher@adella.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Subject: Re: [Comm-en] PAM with ALT Linux
X-BeenThere: community-en@lists.altlinux.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: shigorin@gmail.com, "ALT Linux users \(in English only\)"
	<community-en@lists.altlinux.org>
List-Id: "ALT Linux users \(in English only\)"
	<community-en.lists.altlinux.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.altlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/community-en>, 
	<mailto:community-en-request@lists.altlinux.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.altlinux.org/pipermail/community-en>
List-Post: <mailto:community-en@lists.altlinux.org>
List-Help: <mailto:community-en-request@lists.altlinux.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.altlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/community-en>,
	<mailto:community-en-request@lists.altlinux.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2007 21:04:28 -0000
Archived-At: <http://lore.altlinux.org/community-en/20071109210426.GI7939@osdn.org.ua/>
List-Archive: <http://lore.altlinux.org/community-en/>

On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 09:21:30PM +0100, Daniel Rocher wrote:
> >Daniel, you'd probably need to supply an ALTLinux-customized
> >PAM config for your application made along these lines.

BTW it's relevant at least for Owl GNU/*/Linux by default too.

> >Better, use the following (not tested):
> > auth include system-auth
> It's work perfectly !

[snip]

> >It relies on the fact that we have system-wide 'system-auth'
> >PAM config which does common magic (like system-auth-local
> >above).
> I understand. Perhaps directly in ALT Linux rpm packages

Or you might want to follow best practices (that is, reusing
configuration in this case) and include system-auth on other
distros instead of relying on particular scheme in your snippet:
there are other auth modules (someone would use e.g. pam_ldap).

PS: I've checked nearby VPSes with Mandriva 2007.1, FC6,
CentOS 4.4 -- all of them do provide /etc/pam.d/system-auth.
Only Debian Etch would diverge calling that "common-auth".

-- 
 ---- WBR, Michael Shigorin <mike@altlinux.ru>
  ------ Linux.Kiev http://www.linux.kiev.ua/