From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 21:08:09 +0200 From: Michael Shigorin To: vadim@mail.cytspb.rssi.ru Cc: community-en@altlinux.org Subject: Re: [Comm-en] ALT for scientist (but not only) Message-ID: <20030220190809.GE31920@osdn.org.ua> Mail-Followup-To: vadim@mail.cytspb.rssi.ru, community-en@altlinux.org References: <3E514094.10962.255DC7@localhost> <3E54CB19.87.268982@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3E54CB19.87.268982@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: community-en-admin@altlinux.org Errors-To: community-en-admin@altlinux.org X-BeenThere: community-en@altlinux.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: community-en@altlinux.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 12:33:29PM +0300, vadim@mail.cytspb.rssi.ru wrote: > I don't agree with you. LJ needs to be severely stripped, and > made as compatible with current Windows soft as it is possible. Vadim, it is not so. Windows is Windows, Linux is Linux, and it will stay that way, that's it. You can watch Lindows to see how the attempt you've outlined does. > Otherwise any good scientist will say - my aim is to study my > object, not bash, make or gcc. Scientists or developers? (I know enough, and am M.Sc. myself) 2 smi: BioCD (or SciCD more probably) would be an interesting idea, and I've got some motivation for packaging up some more scientific software. PS: I get this mailing list messages directly into my inbox (opposed to low-priority Russian list), and suspect that's the case with most of ALT Team too -- but it would be better to spend our time wisely. Common talks are, well, common talks, and mostly talked over already for thousands of times... -- ---- WBR, Michael Shigorin ------ Linux.Kiev http://www.linux.kiev.ua/