On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 07:43:39PM +0300, Alexey Rusakov wrote:
> Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> >> ...я был бы не против, 
> >> чтобы libreadline стал important пакетом. Тогда apt будет просить ввести 
> >> что-то длинное при попытке сноса libreadline.
> > 
> > Вероятно, логичнее если apt будет таким "несносным" пакетом.  Зачем apt'ом
> > сносить apt?
> Справедливо.

Между прочим, Максим, судя по всему, морочит нам голову:

# apt-get -q remove libreadline
[...]
WARNING: The following essential packages will be removed
This should NOT be done unless you know exactly what you are doing!
  apt gnupg (due to apt) libreadline (due to apt) basesystem bash (due to basesystem)
[...]
You are about to do something potentially harmful
To continue type in the phrase 'Yes, do as I say!'
 ?]

# apt-get -q remove libapt
Reading Package Lists...
Building Dependency Tree...
The following packages will be REMOVED:
  apt apt-utils hasher libapt sisyphus
WARNING: The following essential packages will be removed
This should NOT be done unless you know exactly what you are doing!
  apt libapt (due to apt)
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 5 removed and NNN not upgraded.
Need to get 0B of archives.
After unpacking 2661kB disk space will be freed.
You are about to do something potentially harmful
To continue type in the phrase 'Yes, do as I say!'

Так что apt и так несносимый, а чтобы снести libreadline, надо было
находиться совсем не в себе.


-- 
ldv