From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2020 04:58:50 +0000 From: QA Team Robot To: sisyphus-cybertalk@lists.altlinux.org Message-ID: <20200909045850.GA10942@gyle.altlinux.org> Mail-Followup-To: sisyphus-cybertalk@lists.altlinux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Subject: [cyber] I: p8/branch packages: +1 (18245) X-BeenThere: sisyphus-cybertalk@lists.altlinux.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: devel@lists.altlinux.org List-Id: ALT Linux Sisyphus cybertalk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2020 04:58:50 -0000 Archived-At: List-Archive: 1 UPDATED package rpminstall-tests - Tests for rpm: how it interprets packages when installing * Sat Aug 29 2020 Ivan Zakharyaschev 1.1.3-alt6.M80P.1 - build the variant for p8 - for p8, harcode the system arch (rpm -q would block in %pre) * Sat Aug 29 2020 Ivan Zakharyaschev 1.1.3-alt7 - Removed the buildtime nprocs value from the *-checkinstall package scriptlets: it would make no sense at runtime. * Fri Jul 03 2020 Ivan Zakharyaschev 1.1.3-alt6 - Run additionally a test with a package built for system rpm's ARCH (i.e., with rpmbuild --target set to it). - Ignore an arch_compat test on ARM (the one introduced in 1.1.3-alt5: with the default arch on this machine) until better times, because the ARM arch detection in rpm-build (<= 4.0.4-alt141) is not ideal yet. * Tue Jun 30 2020 Ivan Zakharyaschev 1.1.3-alt5 - Also test the compatibility between `uname -m`, rpmbuild, and rpm -i. (A separate archcompat-checkinstall subpkg does this.) - First, run a simple test (to fail fast). - In the tests, used the common /bin/tmpdir.sh (from tmpdir.sh pkg). * Tue Jun 04 2019 Ivan Zakharyaschev 1.1.3-alt3.M80P.1 Total 18245 source packages.