From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <4B29F119.1080302@altlinux.com> Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 11:51:37 +0300 From: Anton Farygin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5pre) Gecko/20091019 Thunderbird/3.0pre MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ALT Linux Team development discussions References: <20091217084222.GF24097@osdn.org.ua> In-Reply-To: <20091217084222.GF24097@osdn.org.ua> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [devel] Fwd: Re: CONFIG_DEVTMPFS X-BeenThere: devel@lists.altlinux.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: ALT Linux Team development discussions List-Id: ALT Linux Team development discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 08:52:00 -0000 Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: Только это становится не нужным с DEVTMPFS 17.12.2009 11:42, Michael Shigorin пишет: > Здравствуйте. > А ведь поляки правы -- базовые статические записи в /dev > можно засунуть и в udev, если он становится обязательным > в системе. > > ----- Forwarded message from Patryk Zawadzki ----- > > Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 09:40:32 +0100 > From: Patryk Zawadzki > To: shigorin/gmail.com, > "PLD: Developers list (English)" > Subject: Re: CONFIG_DEVTMPFS > > On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 7:26 PM, Michael Shigorin wrote: >> JFYI, I've done dev-minimal package in ALT Linux >> hoping to use it for this very reason: some bare /dev >> in case modern stuff fails again. >> >> Unfortunately didn't get around to integrating it to distros >> (hmm... maybe today is the day? ;-), only installed by hand >> on a few systems. > > We have udev package providing the minimum required to launch shells > (/dev/zero, /dev/console etc.). It's all nice but still requires > initramfs to create its own device nodes. In case of DEVTMPFS you > don't have to do anything at boot time, just chmod the nodes after > switch_root (or let udev rules do it) :) >