On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 12:42:19AM +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote: > On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 12:03:49AM +0300, Alexey Tourbin wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 10:50:07PM +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote: > > > On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 03:26:40AM +0300, Alexey Tourbin wrote: > > > > So... new VERIFY_ELF_LINT method is ready, and in Sisyphus, it is going > > > > to be enabled (lint=normal) by default. Shall I enable it for branch-5.1 > > > > as well? > > > > > > Let's check whether eu-elflint has yet more false positives to be fixed. > > > > How do we check? Checking the existing (pre-compiled) packages is > > useless, since most of them are compiled with older toolchain (and > > most of the lint warnings will go away as packages are recompiled). > > For example, we could introduce this new check as "relaxed" and run > a test rebuild. > > > Okay, probably I'm going to release 4.0.4-alt98.25 anyway. > > Next test rebuild is going to start now, but I can delay it to get new > rpmbuild packaged first. 4.0.4-alt98.25 with lint=relaxed is in sisyphus.