From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 00:42:19 +0300 From: "Dmitry V. Levin" To: ALT Devel discussion list Message-ID: <20091219214217.GA2033@wo.int.altlinux.org> Mail-Followup-To: ALT Devel discussion list References: <20091217211624.GA3586@ssh.git.orion.altlinux.org> <20091217215238.GN9864@altlinux.org> <20091217215921.GO9864@altlinux.org> <20091217224429.GA28428@wo.int.altlinux.org> <20091218000542.GQ9864@altlinux.org> <20091219002640.GU9864@altlinux.org> <20091219195007.GA1460@wo.int.altlinux.org> <20091219210349.GX9864@altlinux.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="bp/iNruPH9dso1Pn" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091219210349.GX9864@altlinux.org> X-fingerprint: FE4C 93AB E19A 2E4C CB5D 3E4E 7CAB E6AC 9E35 361E Subject: Re: [devel] verify-elf lint=normal (elflint) X-BeenThere: devel@lists.altlinux.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: ALT Linux Team development discussions List-Id: ALT Linux Team development discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 21:42:21 -0000 Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: --bp/iNruPH9dso1Pn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 12:03:49AM +0300, Alexey Tourbin wrote: > On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 10:50:07PM +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 03:26:40AM +0300, Alexey Tourbin wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 03:05:42AM +0300, Alexey Tourbin wrote: > > > > Actually I think maybe we should integrate eu-elflint into > > > > /usr/lib/rpm/verify-elf. It has --gnu-ld flag to stop barking > > > > at binutils semi-bugs, and otherwise it's useful. > > >=20 > > > So... new VERIFY_ELF_LINT method is ready, and in Sisyphus, it is goi= ng > > > to be enabled (lint=3Dnormal) by default. Shall I enable it for bran= ch-5.1 > > > as well? > >=20 > > Let's check whether eu-elflint has yet more false positives to be fixed. >=20 > How do we check? Checking the existing (pre-compiled) packages is > useless, since most of them are compiled with older toolchain (and > most of the lint warnings will go away as packages are recompiled). For example, we could introduce this new check as "relaxed" and run a test rebuild. > Okay, probably I'm going to release 4.0.4-alt98.25 anyway. Next test rebuild is going to start now, but I can delay it to get new rpmbuild packaged first. --=20 ldv --bp/iNruPH9dso1Pn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkstSLcACgkQfKvmrJ41Nh5KqgCeIYRvlqFORaSySNJbXF66Tt9S sbUAn0hcNtf0MMBFgmj22pJq+13XqJ+N =Y3Ah -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --bp/iNruPH9dso1Pn--