On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 12:03:49AM +0300, Alexey Tourbin wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 10:50:07PM +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 03:26:40AM +0300, Alexey Tourbin wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 03:05:42AM +0300, Alexey Tourbin wrote:
> > > > Actually I think maybe we should integrate eu-elflint into
> > > > /usr/lib/rpm/verify-elf.  It has --gnu-ld flag to stop barking
> > > > at binutils semi-bugs, and otherwise it's useful.
> > > 
> > > So... new VERIFY_ELF_LINT method is ready, and in Sisyphus, it is going
> > > to be enabled (lint=normal) by default.  Shall I enable it for branch-5.1
> > > as well?
> > 
> > Let's check whether eu-elflint has yet more false positives to be fixed.
> 
> How do we check?  Checking the existing (pre-compiled) packages is
> useless, since most of them are compiled with older toolchain (and
> most of the lint warnings will go away as packages are recompiled).

For example, we could introduce this new check as "relaxed" and run
a test rebuild.

> Okay, probably I'm going to release 4.0.4-alt98.25 anyway.

Next test rebuild is going to start now, but I can delay it to get new
rpmbuild packaged first.


-- 
ldv