From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 23:58:33 +0300 From: Mikhail Zabaluev To: ALT Devel discussion list Message-ID: <20040117205833.GA1582@mhz.mikhail.zabaluev.name> Mail-Followup-To: Mikhail Zabaluev , ALT Devel discussion list References: <20040117184725.GA5881@mhz.mikhail.zabaluev.name> <20040117192748.GA6548@nomad.office.altlinux.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040117192748.GA6548@nomad.office.altlinux.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Subject: [devel] Re: Name conflicts in jdkgcj, gcc-java-common, and j2se1.?-* X-BeenThere: devel@altlinux.ru X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list Reply-To: ALT Devel discussion list List-Id: ALT Devel discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 23:01:02 -0000 Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: --k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hello Dmitry, On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 10:27:49PM +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote: > > А не объединить ли gcc-java-common с jdkgcj? Мысль хорошая, только у jdkgcj внешний источник со своими версиями. Влить его в gcc-java-common и забыть про версии jdkgcj? Он вообще-то свою версию рапортует, так что получится не очень красиво. -- Stay tuned, MhZ JID: mhz@altlinux.org ___________ Elves on strike. (Why do they call EMAG Elf Magic) --k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFACaH5TKqCuNPJlLgRAmNtAKCnQcDDGSgFjzUPt343zxODskFM/wCeLrfY 3v3CMkOfsURVKuAZWlzgaoA= =Sif/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0--