From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <ldv@altlinux.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 14:17:53 +0300
From: "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@altlinux.org>
To: ALT Devel discussion list <devel@altlinux.ru>
Subject: Re: [devel] Q: lt_cv_cc_static_works=no
Message-ID: <20031223111753.GB906@basalt.office.altlinux.org>
Mail-Followup-To: ALT Devel discussion list <devel@altlinux.ru>
References: <20031223064955.GF27085@inferno.immo>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="p4qYPpj5QlsIQJ0K"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20031223064955.GF27085@inferno.immo>
X-fingerprint: 9658 398D 181B 1200 8FC5  26B8 F6F8 846B C1E2 3429
X-BeenThere: devel@altlinux.ru
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.3
Precedence: list
Reply-To: ALT Devel discussion list <devel@altlinux.ru>
List-Id: ALT Devel discussion list <devel.altlinux.ru>
List-Unsubscribe: <listinfo/devel>,
	<mailto:devel-request@altlinux.ru?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </pipermail/devel>
List-Post: <mailto:devel@altlinux.ru>
List-Help: <mailto:devel-request@altlinux.ru?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <listinfo/devel>,
	<mailto:devel-request@altlinux.ru?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 11:18:04 -0000
Archived-At: <http://lore.altlinux.org/devel/20031223111753.GB906@basalt.office.altlinux.org/>
List-Archive: <http://lore.altlinux.org/devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:devel@altlinux.org>


--p4qYPpj5QlsIQJ0K
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 09:49:55AM +0300, Alexey I. Froloff wrote:
> Обсуждали с taniwha на IRC последнюю проблему с libtool и
> статическими библиотеками.  Вот частичный лог:
> 
>  * raorn wonders, will it work with lt_cv_prog_cc_static_works=no....
> <raorn> hm... grep says, lt_cv_prog_cc_static_works=no will work...
> <taniwha> you really shouldn't be messing with that
> <taniwha> just configure with --disable-static
> <taniwha> for one thing, that only affects linking
> <raorn> taniwha: i'm afraid, this export will be included in
>         %configure rpm macro some day...
> <taniwha> if that happens, dump rpm
> <taniwha> or patch rpm to remove /any/ such export
> <raorn> as far as i can see
> <raorn> if it will cause any problems, rpm will be fixed ;-)
> <taniwha> still, why not do the sane thing and just use the
>           options to configure?
> 
> Вот действительно, зачем это нужно?

Это равносильно неустановке пакета glibc-devel-static.
Нужно это для того, чтобы в системе, где glibc-devel-static установлен,
buildreq не включал его в сборочные зависимости без необходимости.


-- 
ldv

--p4qYPpj5QlsIQJ0K
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/6CRh9viEa8HiNCkRAsRPAJ94ujjgUCV4rpRUhmWizppfS9PpBACffE2u
n4vHnATXXcUVx04NQDoX+zo=
=0PH7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--p4qYPpj5QlsIQJ0K--