From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <raorn@immo.ru>
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 09:49:55 +0300
From: "Alexey I. Froloff" <sir_raorn@immo.ru>
To: ALTLinux devel <devel@altlinux.ru>
Message-ID: <20031223064955.GF27085@inferno.immo>
Mail-Followup-To: ALTLinux devel <devel@altlinux.ru>, qa@altlinux.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="+cdUESGy8E0PQTBL"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-Envelope-To: devel@altlinux.ru,
 qa@altlinux.org
Cc: qa@altlinux.org
Subject: [devel] Q: lt_cv_cc_static_works=no
X-BeenThere: devel@altlinux.ru
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.3
Precedence: list
Reply-To: ALT Devel discussion list <devel@altlinux.ru>
List-Id: ALT Devel discussion list <devel.altlinux.ru>
List-Unsubscribe: <listinfo/devel>,
	<mailto:devel-request@altlinux.ru?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </pipermail/devel>
List-Post: <mailto:devel@altlinux.ru>
List-Help: <mailto:devel-request@altlinux.ru?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <listinfo/devel>,
	<mailto:devel-request@altlinux.ru?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 06:49:57 -0000
Archived-At: <http://lore.altlinux.org/devel/20031223064955.GF27085@inferno.immo/>
List-Archive: <http://lore.altlinux.org/devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:devel@altlinux.org>


--+cdUESGy8E0PQTBL
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Обсуждали с taniwha на IRC последнюю проблему с libtool и
статическими библиотеками.  Вот частичный лог:

 * raorn wonders, will it work with lt_cv_prog_cc_static_works=no....
<raorn> hm... grep says, lt_cv_prog_cc_static_works=no will work...
<taniwha> you really shouldn't be messing with that
<taniwha> just configure with --disable-static
<taniwha> for one thing, that only affects linking
<raorn> taniwha: i'm afraid, this export will be included in
        %configure rpm macro some day...
<taniwha> if that happens, dump rpm
<taniwha> or patch rpm to remove /any/ such export
<raorn> as far as i can see
<raorn> if it will cause any problems, rpm will be fixed ;-)
<taniwha> still, why not do the sane thing and just use the
          options to configure?

Вот действительно, зачем это нужно?

-- 
Regards, Sir Raorn.
-------------------
> Значит на сборочном сервере на момент сборки не стоял новый libwmf-devel ;-(
Он не может быть поставлен; apt-get считает, что сохранить ImageMagick
важнее, чем поставить новый libwmf.
		-- ldv in sisyphus@

--+cdUESGy8E0PQTBL
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/5+WTVqT7+fkT8woRAt8bAKCyrnMLJmGfC+Mxar1AwHuKpKFViACeMoEC
uUXdFQ60g7XWqnqY9Vn2ISE=
=Xj2b
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--+cdUESGy8E0PQTBL--