From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on sa.int.altlinux.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 11:31:37 +0200 From: Michael Shigorin To: community-en@lists.altlinux.org Message-ID: <20090224093137.GO20208@osdn.org.ua> Mail-Followup-To: community-en@lists.altlinux.org References: <200902231931.56647.virtualsky.sk@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200902231931.56647.virtualsky.sk@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Re: [Comm-en] ALT Server 4.0 - Setting up a webserver X-BeenThere: community-en@lists.altlinux.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10b3 Precedence: list Reply-To: shigorin@gmail.com, "ALT Linux users \(in English only\)" List-Id: "ALT Linux users \(in English only\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 09:31:40 -0000 Archived-At: List-Archive: On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 07:31:56PM -0600, Virtual Sky Solutions wrote: > Is there somewhere in the HTTP system interface that I missed? I'm afraid not... I've tried to come up with webapp policy since ca. 2005 or so but got frustrated with overall quality of webapps (only a few would fit the scheme which wouldn't do duplicates which are more of a mess to maintain with security updates), and so far no one seems to have adapted e.g. Debian's one (which got another push in the meantime). There's not much sense in thinking "yeah, you can create a VE template with e.g. apache, then VE itself, and then start it" is an answer to the question of "can I bring up a webserver this way?" IMO. -- ---- WBR, Michael Shigorin ------ Linux.Kiev http://www.linux.kiev.ua/